BOBIER METROLOGY SOLUTIONS
LABORATORY ACCREDITATION OR ISO 9001 CERTIFICATION?
Advantages to Consider
To ensure continued compliance, accredited facilities are regularly reexamined to ensure they maintain their standards of technical expertise. These facilities may also be required to participate in regular proficiency testing program or inter-laboratory comparisons as an ongoing demonstrations of their competence. ISO 9001 does not evaluate the technical competence of a supplier. This means that the evaluation of a supplier against ISO 9001 does not assure you our your customers that the test, inspection, or calibration data are accurate and reliable.
Throughout the world, many countries now rely on a process called Laboratory Accreditation as a means of independently evaluating laboratory competence.
Unlike ISO 9001 certification, laboratory accreditation uses criteria and procedures specifically developed to determine technical competence. Independent A2LA technical assessors conduct a thorough evaluation of all factors in a facility that effects the accuracy and repeatability of measurement data.
THIS ISO/IEC 17025 STANDARD SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES FACTORS REVELENT TO A LABORATORY'S ABILITY TO PRODUCE PRECISE, ACCURATE TEST AND CALIBRATION DATA, INCLUDING:
CONCLUSION:
There are differences between the purpose, criteria, and emphasis of the ISO 9001 quality system standards and those of the accreditation standard ISO/IEC 17025.
For laboratories concerned with demonstrating technical competence underlined by a quality system, ISO/IEC 17025 is the appropriate standard. Similarly, suppliers seeking competent testing facilities should ensure that those facilities should ensure that those facilities are accredited to ISO/IEC 17025, with a scope of accreditation appropriate for the testing or calibration required.
Why is a laboratory's technical competence so critical to you as a manufacturer, supplier, exporter, or customer?
VIEW OUR COMPLETE ISO/IEC 17025 A2LA SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION